CC: BermudaSucks.com, The Royal Gazette, The Bermuda Sun
Dear P,
How are things? Haven’t seen much of you in the news lately, so I guess you must be busy helping Paula with the budget or something. Well, that must be quite a task, dividing up the dollars between cricket and home renovations. You know, there are some neat financial planning programmes you can put on a pda, not sure if they work on Blackberry devices though.
Still, if I may interrupt, I have a few things I’d like to ask about, if you’re not too busy. I reckon a lot of people share these questions. Like, I saw that the DPP is reviewing the Rebecca Middleton case. I really hope that goes somewhere. After close to ten years, I hope her parents get some kind of justice and closure. Have you been in touch with them? What I would really like to know about this is what has government done about improving the judiciary system to ensure that this never, ever, ever happens again. Has there been any major overhaul of the system? Or improved training for those involved? Has the cause of the screw-ups been identified?
On a related topic, what on earth are you going to do to sort out sentencing in the courts? It all seems to be haywire to me. I bet you read the Royal Gazette and Bermuda Sucks too, so you must have noticed that sentencing seems to be, well, lets say inconsistent. Back in the day, the dude that did get convicted over Rebecca’s attack got 5 years in jail. He is still in jail because of a much longer sentence for armed robbery. It was before your time as Premier I know, but maybe you can explain why the armed robbery attracted a much longer sentence? The dude that wasn’t convicted because of those screw-ups did get a year for stabbing a woman. A year. Twelve months.
You see, P, I’m a woman and this concerns me too. Heck, it concerns most of the blokes I know. More recently (and within your time as Premier) we have seen a man who sexually assaulted children over a period of time get a mere sixteen month sentence for destroying their lives and family. We’ve seen men who brutally attack their wives get lighter sentences than people with not enough weed to get high. Others have escaped conviction altogether. Do the sentencing judges have no guidelines, bad guidelines, or do they just not apply them? I’m sure that behind the scenes you must be working really hard to put this right, but how about blowing your own trumpet and telling us exactly what measures you are taking to improve the Bermuda legal system?
Good luck with the cricket. And while you’re balancing that budget, I know you’ll be remembering to include a much-increased amount for the Women’s Resource Centre and for victims of child abuse, even if they are less important than the world cup and your nice cornices.
Yours sincerely,
Aj Baker
Who broke the rant room then?
Posted by: Marcus | Mar 21, 2006 at 02:08 PM
There have been some issues with the forum, it'll be back online ASAP.
Posted by: Reality | Mar 21, 2006 at 06:33 PM
The hosting provider upgraded PHP and the Simple Machines Forum choked on an ampersand. It took me a day to find it and put things right.
Posted by: Mike | Mar 23, 2006 at 08:01 PM
Good points for sure. I think I know the answer! After speaking to someone who spoke to a judge off line, it is simple, the Judge only referees the court case not decides it. The jury decides the outcome. Who is on the jury you ask, well it's your cousin (twice removed of course). Therefore, relatives = walk free. After all, wouldn't we want the same consideration if we were on trial? This place is too small and everyone knows someone who knows the person on trial, it's just the way it is. Also, if you think an Expat would have a fair trial against a Bermudian, think again, it does not work that way, and has been proven time and time again. Ever hear of the man trying to help a woman being bugged by a guy in a bar, by simply asking "are you o.k.?" and got hit with a bottle which ripped open his face? Everyone saw it, but the poor guy lost the court case. Juries in most cases won't convict a local over an Expat, it's just the way it is. Even the judges can't do anything about it. It's disgusting, and the people who sit on the juries only have themselves to blame. These are the same twits who complain that justice is not being served.
Posted by: RockPig | Mar 24, 2006 at 08:18 AM
RockPig,
You are mostly right about juries. However, in Becky's case, Tekle Mallory's and others, the problem was that the judges didn't let the cases go to juries. They ruled "no case to answer"--in other words, insufficient evidence. In Becky's case, the appeals court found the judge's ruling "astonishing." However, owing to a glitch in Bermuda law, an appeal can't be made on a judge's ruling. Both the SCC and the Privy Council said the matter should be "discussed" immediately. Some, though, appear to be quite happy with the status quo...
Posted by: BermudaSea | Aug 12, 2006 at 02:56 PM
Still not seeing any greater sanity in sentencing. It is still ok to beat women in Bermuda apparently.
Posted by: Aj | Aug 15, 2006 at 07:46 PM